Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 11:00

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
As it happened: GC showdown in the high mountains at stage 7 of Critérium du Dauphiné - Cyclingnews
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Confirmed rabies case in Fayetteville after fox bites home inspector - WRAL.com
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
If a cat is feminine in German, what article do you give to a male cat?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
The 10-Year Auction and Inflation Data Could Jolt the Bond Market - Barron's
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Finals Film Study: Thunder offense vs. Pacers' defense - NBA
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.